Is Vegetarianism Essential for Green Living?

If your goal is to live lightly on the planet and embrace an eco-friendly lifestyle, at some point, you need to decide whether that means cutting meat out of your diet. People become vegetarians, meaning that they don’t eat meat, and even vegans, meaning that they don’t consume meat, dairy, or other animal byproducts, for health reasons, philosophical reasons, or both.

When you ask people why they choose to be vegetarians, they often tell you that they’re protesting against the meat industry’s production methods and treatment of animals. Others give up meat in favor of vegetarianism because they’re alarmed by health issues. Still others are concerned about the resources that go into the production of meat. Grain-feeding animals in a factory farm uses up a lot of resources — power for lighting and machinery and water to flush away effluent. Even though many farmers keep their cattle and sheep out in the fields, the animals’ diets often are supplemented with grain.

Researchers now use the word foodprint to indicate the amount of land that various diets require to sustain them; the idea is linked closely with the idea of a person’s ecological footprint. The bottom line is that a more sustainable diet requires less land per person. The popular notion is that a meat-free diet uses the least land and is thus the greenest, most sustainable way of eating. This is in part because animals consume feed grown on land that could otherwise grow crops for humans.

However, researchers at Cornell University recently added a new twist to this argument when they explained that, depending on the specific type of land that surrounds you, a diet that contains a small amount of meat and dairy actually can be more efficient than a straight vegetarian diet. That’s because vegetarian crops require higher quality land than the pasture land that animals need. So if your geographic area and climate offer more pasture land than crop land, it can be more efficient to eat a small amount of meat. (The Cornell researchers suggested an annual meat and egg intake that averaged out to approximately 2 cooked ounces per day.)

This argument over the greenest use of land for food, which is particularly applicable given the current emphasis on eating local food in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, demonstrates why green issues are rarely black and white and why one solution doesn’t necessarily fit all situations. So if you lust for a lamb shank and pine for a pork chop, you can still pursue a green eating strategy. Meat can be, and is, produced in the same organic and sustainable way that many fruits and vegetables are farmed. You can cut down your impact on the planet’s resources by reducing the amount of meat you eat and choosing meat from sustainably raised and humanely treated animals.

Comments (6)

  1. Posted by barrie wheatley
    There is still no need for animals to be killed or kept in poor conditions. Man can live quite happily on vegetables alone particularly now that there are many 'meat' substitutes available.
  2. Posted by edward dede
    I'd like 3 or 4 chicken legs baked or fried for supper. Please dip them in a beaten egg and throw them in a plastic bag to cover them in seasoned poultry coating. the so-called Green Foot Print a chicken makes is ZERO in most cases as they are in a small enclosure without grass underfoot.I rest my case!
  3. Posted by Savanna Bailey
    This is what gets me, people are so ignorant to the suffering of the daily lives of the animals. Not just the slaughter part. Most mass-produced animals cannot live their full extent. What needs to be asked of the population is not to just totally eliminate regularly produced meat from their diets but to re-evaluate the way meats can be properly provided. and raised. I dont mean shocking them "unconcious" and THEN slitting their throats ( and not always do they get knocked out i might add). The shocking part is how much money the U.S. government wastes money on things like these. These are YOUR TAXES. Each year the government spends $5 billion on animal lab experiments alone. Even things that dont have meat in it are becoming chemically altered for convenience. If i am just one fifteen [expletive deleted] year old girl and I can make these assumptions then imagine what the government could do with their education and power. If only the society wasn't so self centered....
  4. Posted by 4ndyman
    Savanna, Not that your opinions are not valid, but animal testing has nothing to do with vegetarianism. Neither does the addition of chemicals to non-meats. Animal testing in science is on the wane, but it'll never go away. The life and health of too many people depends on it. (And I'm not talking about scientists' paychecks.)
  5. Posted by Neva
    I don't eat meat NOT because of the killing of animals. I don't eat it because it's unhealthy crap that goes into how it is raised with chemicals. I try to eat what is GOOD for you! So my body will feel good & I can stay alive as long as I can for the sake of my grandkids! There are too many perservatives and all the stupid stuff that goes in making stuff that is NOT made from scratch. I don't use Salt. I don't eat MAN MADE stuff crap food! I don't eat out of boxes or cans that are made with chemicals and things I can't pronounce in them! And people wonder why over half of society is OBESE! They need pills for all thier ills or get cancer! DUH! Do ya people not realize that making themself ill AND fat?
  6. Posted by Jessica
    Neva - you do realize that vegtables are chemically treated as well. I agree with some of the points that you made. I don't eat many items that are found in the grocery store because I don't want to eat anything that has unhealthy preservatives and chemicals. I DO eat meat!!! I purchase them from local farmers that are not raising them just to be slaughtered. Also, what I can't grow my self, I either buy from the local farmers market or I don't eat it. The issue should not be about if a person eats meat or not; the issue should be about where they got it from. I'm sure I will get comments back about what I'm about to say, but I don't care! I hunt many animals! There are many negative stereotype about hunters. But majority of people don't understand the concept of a responsible hunter they only hear the negative. I was taught to hunt, clean, and eat many types of animals. I don't kill anything that I will not eat. We use all parts of the animal in one way or another. Meat to eat, fur to cloth, and the very few remains are used in composting to grow our vegetable gardens. (I'm sure I'll get comments from PETA, especially after the fur comment, but thats a whole other discusion) Anyways the point is.... I don't buy commercially processed foods. If you can't hunt, It would be wise to find local organic farmers will allow to purchase fruits, vegetables, meat, dairy, and grain directly from the farm.

Leave a Reply


Post Comment

Connect with For Dummies

Sign Up for RSS Feeds

Home & Garden

Inside Dummies.com