Busting the Great Myths of Fat Burning

Your body burns either fat or carbs depending on the intensity of your activity. But when it comes to losing weight, calories are calories. You burn fat even when you're in couch-potato mode. Yet, a lot of misunderstanding prevails.

Get ready to break down some of the myths people have about burning fat:

  • Myth: The body completely shuts off one fuel source when it turns on the other.
    The Truth: What has often been misunderstood by both exercisers and exercise instructors alike is that the body relies on both fat and carbs for energy all the time, albeit in different ratios. In fact, as you sit here reading, you may be burning about 50-60 percent fat and 50-40 percent carbohydrates. You're not using much of either, however, because the amount of calories you need probably amounts to about one or two calories a minute. If you were to get up and start jogging in place, your body would need to supply you with some quick energy to do so, so the metabolism ratio might shift to drawing upon more carbohydrates, say 70 percent, and less fat, say 30 percent. If you were to continue jogging, then, in order to preserve the carbs (which can run out since you have limited stores in the body), your body would gradually shift its metabolism ratio again to say, 60 percent fat and 40 percent carbohydrates. From an energy efficiency point of view, it pays to be fit. The endurance athlete would be able to make the shift sooner, and his fat-burning percentage might be 65-75 percent.
    However, in practical terms this is purely technotalk, and these ratios don't make a big difference when it comes to losing weight and decreasing your body fat. For the most part, athletes are often leaner not because they might rely on slightly more fat for fuel, but because they practice their sport two to three, or more, hours a day — this burns a lot of calories. If you had the time, energy, and fitness level to work out three hours a day, being overweight would probably not be an issue. To lose weight, you need to burn more calories than your body consumes and uses everyday. Exercise is one main way to burn a lot of calories. But when it comes to weight loss, what matters is how many calories you burn, not so much whether they are fat or carbohydrate calories.
  • Myth: Exercise done at a low intensity, such as walking, is better at fat burning than other high-intensity activities, like running or cardio activities where you push yourself very hard.
    The Truth: In a strict scientific sense, these claims are true because working at a lower intensity requires less quick energy and a higher percentage of fat is burned. But you'll also burn fewer calories than you would if, for the same amount of time, you work out at a harder intensity (running versus walking). If you're trying to lose weight, even though a higher percentage of fat is being used, a lower total amount of fat is lost.
    Whether increased fat burning will result in actual weight loss is dependent upon several variables, including the total calories burned (which include both fat and carbohydrate calories) and the total fat calories burned. If you do work at a low intensity, you need to increase the time spent exercising to burn more calories. What matters most is the total number of calories burned. If you burned 250 calories every day from a short, fast jog, you'd see a bigger difference in weight and fat loss than if you walked everyday for the same amount of time. The number of fat calories you burn isn't that important, because even if you burn a lot of carb calories, these need to be replaced both by the carbs you eat in your diet and also within your body. Your fat stores will be broken down and transformed into carbohydrates when you need fuel. Even if you're burning lots of carb calories and less fat calories through exercise, your fat still inevitably gets used.
    It boils — not burns — down to this: During the same amount of time you don't use more calories at lower exercise intensities. If you're trying to lose weight and you have only 30 minutes to work out, you would burn fewer calories walking at a moderate pace compared to walking at a fast pace. Working out at higher intensities may cause you to burn a lower percentage of fat, but since you burn more total calories, you still use more fat calories.
    Low- to moderate-intensity exercise can burn a significant number of calories over a period of time. If you aren't fit enough to push yourself to work at a high intensity, or you have a physical weakness that prevents you from doing so, you can still burn a lot of calories by doing low-intensity workouts for a longer period of time.
  • Myth: Running, cycling, or other cardio activities are more fat burning once you've been doing them for more than 15 or 20 minutes.
    The Truth: Technically, once you've been exercising for 15 or 20 minutes, your body has made the shift to using a higher percentage of fat for fuel. But again, if you're trying to lose weight, it's about the total number of calories burned, not necessarily the fuel source.
    For example, say that at rest you burn up to 60 percent fat. When you enter the initial phases of intense exercise, the ratio changes. You may now burn only 30 percent fat because your body is using quick-energy carbohydrates. Once the exercise is sustained, the body switches back to using a higher percentage of fat to fuel the movement (up to 75 percent fat). In this aerobic phase of exercise, a higher percentage of fat is being used for energy. But if you aren't working out for a very long period, you may still burn more total calories and, therefore, more fat calories working out harder. Put another way, if burning as many calories as you can is the best way to lose weight, even a dummy can figure out which activity of the following is going to give the best results (answer: jogging and sprinting), even though their fat-burning quota is on the low end of the ratio.

Activity

Calories Burned

Fat Percentage

Calories from Fat

Watching TV for 20 minutes

40 calories

60 percent

24 calories

Walking for 20 minutes

100 calories

65 percent

65 calories

Jogging & sprinting for 20 minutes

250 calories

40 percent

100 calories

Comments (34)

  1. Posted by rdiroma
    I think the article about "Busting the Great Myths of Fat Burning" is confusing at best and wrong or misleading in this article. Perhaps a more qualified person can correct the errors. E.G ,it mentions that only fat and carbohydrates are burned for energy. It's known that protein can also be a fuel source. A few more errors can be found.
  2. Posted by Erin Carraway
    FINALLY! This is one of the best articles I have seen regarding how a body uses fat and carbohydrate to fuel the body. Not since my exercise physiology classes have I seen such a great explanation. Yes - It is a bit confusing, mainly because so much misinformation is out there to counter. Well done! (note: protein can be burned, but only when there is a dearth of carbohydrates and fat to pull from. It can be very dangerous as well, as the ketones add up and the body (kidneys?) have a difficult time removing waste products from the broken down protein.) Erin@obesityfreeforlife.com
  3. Posted by seemetri
    YEAH! I've been explaining this for years to other fitness professionals who have fallen into this fat burning zone trap! Thank you for explaining this in such a basic way that all can understand!
  4. Posted by Lal
    This is not the first time iv'e read an article like this, and i also have tried it by striking a balance between both high intensity and low with great results. am now starting it over once again
  5. Posted by Garret
    I have lost over 50 pounds in the past month by lowering my calorie income and mixing high intensity with low intensity workouts. (mostly riding a exercise bike) I have been looking all over google for this info. The secret is how you warm up and make that switch from burning calories to burning fat. Don't eat at night and try to workout 5 or more days a week, but remember your body needs to recover. Mixing up your workout helps also. Protien is important to repair your muscles mostly, so be careful and find the perfect mix between your protien intake and the kind of workout you are doing. Try to take no less and no more than two days off in a row or you will loose the forward progress you have made. I don't want to say and I know people won't like this but I believe the "starvation mode" is a myth, the idea came from the concept that we are like cave men and our body conserve fat if we don't eat a lot so we will have energy to hunt and survive later down the road. As a life form we evolve just as animals and other life forms evolve. It works for me as long as I am careful doing it, I still eat a small meal a day. One more thing WATER! WATER! WATER! And nothing else.
  6. Posted by Michele
    The major point here is that you consistently work out, mixing it up seems to help. I also have looked all over to find out about burning carbs...this is the first place that finally gave me some explanation.
  7. Posted by cherry
    I actually bookmarked this page
  8. Posted by Yauhoooo
    Hi, I found your site using http://www.yauhoooo.com Yauhoooo, does your site support Firefox?
  9. Posted by Steven Smith
    Garret, please tell me that you eat more than one small meal a day.
  10. Posted by tkmslee
    Personal experience has proven to me, time after time, that high intensity sprinting 2 -3 times a week will burn fat more effectively than long slow-burn type of exercises. I have seen this in my own training again and again, I have even gotten in the trap of believing that low intensity jogging is best...but every time I go back to sprinting, I loose a lot more weight.
  11. Posted by Robinson Cruz
    I guess this comment should be called "busting the great myths of busting the great myths of fat burning." The article is correct that calories count, but it is not correct that a calorie is a calorie, or that glycogen burned preferentially over fat in high-intensity exercise can be replaced from fat stores. Fat stored in adipocytes has no biochemical pathway to contribute significantly to replenishment of glycogen. So if two exercise regimens use the same number of calories, lower intensity exercise will reduce body fat more than high-intensity exercise (>65% VO2max). Yes, if you jog instead of running or running/sprinting, you will burn calories more slowly, requiring longer exercise. But jogging IS the better way to reduce fat stores in the body. See this review article for biochemical pathways for replenishing muscle and liver-based glycogen after high-intensity execise. Notice no mention of using fat to replenish glyogen. http://ajpendo.physiology.org/cgi/content/abstract/253/3/E305
  12. Posted by Jebus
    Experiment people! don't take everything as gospel - remember genetics? Too many factors have to be accounted for ie. temerature, humidity, diet, dietary calory composition (how much fat, carbo, protein, minerals, vitamins, water, etc contribute to what percentage of your calory intake), are you predominantly fast twitch or slow twitch? Eat when you are hungry - eat slowly so you can tell when you are no longer hungry NOT when you're full - there is a lag time between stretch receptors in the stomach and the message reaching the brain, also when you eat til fullness, eventually fullness becomes a much higher threshold due to the stomach stretching. This applies to water also - DO NOT drink until full! As for starvation and increased storage of fat as an evolutionary tactic - it happens, full stop, but when you work out and starve yourself, the body HAS TO burn that little bit of storage - it HAS TO otherwise you would just collapse into a heap - think about it, did cavemen get fatter when there was little food? Especially since they were still spending calories looking for food? THINK ABOUT IT! Try everything for a month and see the effect.
  13. Posted by Tim Kane
    The person who wrote this article is not very educated.For instance, the fat can not be transform into carbs!!!(myth#2)
  14. Posted by Maxasvat
    Yes, protein is used as a fuel source, but in order for your body to consume protein as a fuel source your body needs to be working at a very high intensity and for a duration longer then 20 minutes, and even then protein is the last fuel source to be used by the body during aerobic activities such as the ones in the article.
  15. Posted by jason
    A fat loss program that I really liked and lost a lost a lot of belly fay with is Beach Body IQ and Lean Body IQ. http://www.leanbodyiq.com http://www.beachbodyiq.com
  16. Posted by Paul Rogers
    It seems Robinson Cruz has misunderstood the article, which is an excellent summary of the exercise physiology of fat burning. The author was not saying that fat can "replace" glycogen as a fuel substrate, only that as glucose gets used, and blood, liver and muscle depots are reduced, fat becomes more available as a fuel as the body instinctively adjusts to protect precious glucose for the brain and nervous system. The hormonal environment controls this. That's why high-intensity exercise can result in burning fat: it swings the body's metabolic pendulum -- by using glucose -- to a state where fat can be used more preferentially, but not *during* high-intensity, which generally requires glucose or phosphocreatine. After 'higher intensity', or even 'longer duration' exercise, at rest glucose stores will be low, insulin will be low, glucagon and lipolysis will be high and fat burning will be preferred. As the author says, it matters not whether you target fat burning, only that you target energy expenditure. You have to consider it over a continuum of, say, 24 hours.
  17. Posted by Guru
    Paul Rogers is correct. Forcing the body to burn glycogen (sugars/carbs) by performing extended high intensity cardio sessions will result in additional fat loss. Pushing the body to these levels will trigger the body to develop even more fat burning enzymes so that it can be ready in future high intensity cardio workout sessions to burn more fat per unit time and conserve those precious glycogen stores. This happens because it forces the body to ultimately increase the number of fat burning enzymes and to maximize the use of the bodies ability to transfer fat from body fat stores to the muscles where it is burned. It is only by increasing the number of fat burning enzymes that the body can burn more fat per unit time under high intensity cardio conditions. If the body is never pushed to these levels there is no need for the body to increase the numbers of these enzymes as the body can easily maintain the balance between fat calories and glycogen calories burned during lower intensity workouts. As a side benefit, the overall increased level of fat burning enzymes will burn more fat calories all day long even when not working out. More important however is the second point....there is a limit to the amount of fat calories that can be stored in the muscles and bloodstream (ready for immediate use)and when performing exercise these stores are used up and fat calories then have to come from the fat stores on your body - around the waist the buttocks, the thighs, etc.etc.etc. - the fat stores that people want to lose the most. However, there is a limit to the rate at which fat can be transferred while exercising from these fat stores on the body to the muscles where they are burned. The trick is to place a very high demand on the muscles by performing high intensity EXTENDED LENGTH workouts so that the body depeletes the available fat in the muscles and blood stream and is forced to tap into the bodies fat stores. This triggers the body to prepare for future workouts by increasing the amount of fat that can be stored in the muscles and bloodstream (ready for immediate use)reserves which are replenished by transferring more fat from the body fat stores to the muscles and blood stream during your rest periods ... in this way the body can make use of the maximum ability to transfer fat from fat stores to the muscles and bloodstream for a period of time much longer than the length of the actual workout and all those fat burning enzymes will have more fuel to work with while exercising resulting in more fat burned even during high intensity workout. Don't believe it??? Then point out the last performance athlete you've seen with fat stores all over their body ... these athletes eat like horses and almost exclusively perform only high intensity training. Another side benefit is that the body will have so many fat burning enzymes that it can't help but burn more fat all day long ... but to maximize this process it is essential to build more muscle mass ... as everyone should know by now, muscle is where fat is burned all day long even when not exercising. It is also essential to eat multiple small balanced meals throughout the day ... I eat 8 or 9 times a day, 200 - 300 calories at a time. Eating this way enables the body to burn any excess calories consumed by not triggering fat storing processes induced by ingesting massive amounts of calories at one meal.
  18. Posted by Fat Burning Furnace
    i thin now people drink green tea which is an effective way of losing weight. It raises your metabolism and washes out the toxins and fats from your body. Another use of green tea is that it helps you to check or control your appetite. Moreover green tea has a less dose of caffeine than black tea, so it helps you in reducing fat as too much fat is not good for health. So black tea and green tea are like good weight loss tips. you article is the nice mixed-up with myth the truth. truth is always an evident.
  19. Posted by Medical Jobs Australia
    Always we believe dieting is the only way to lose weight but we should also know that without water a human being cannot survive, as in order to make your body function, you need water. Now if you want to lose weight, drinking lemon water is a great tip which you can easily follow. Another natural therapy of drinking water is having coconut water everyday. You can also supplement your daily intake of water with black tea and green tea. So black tea and green tea are like good weight loss tips.
  20. Posted by Mr. Me
    This is a follow to the comment by Tom Kane. Before you call someone uneducated you should be sure you know what you are talking about. Fat which is composed almost entirely of triglycerides, which in turn consist of a glycerol component bonded with 3 fatty acids, the glycerol component of triglycerides can be converted into glucose, via gluconeogenesis. Which the last time I checked glucose was a carb. So yes fat can be converted into a carb if the body requires it.
  21. Posted by Dan
    This is a good article. It is importam to know what you have to do when you want to burn fat. Nutritios and weight training are very important too. We have to consider there 3 factors for being really succesfull. I know a good book about weight loss of a personal trainer who beat cancer. you can find it here: http://fitfun.expfatlos1.hop.clickbank.net/
  22. Posted by Dan
    This is a good article. It is important to know what you have to do when you want to burn fat. Nutrition and weight training are very important too. We have to consider there 3 factors for being really sucesfull. I know a good book about weight loss of a personal trainer who beat cancer: http://fitfun.expfatlos1.hop.clickbank.net/
  23. Posted by Phil
    This is a good, basic article. As many studies have shown, if you burn more then you take in, you lose weight. The arguments around where the calories come from (carbs or fat) don’t make that much of a difference if you are ‘eating clean’ and mixing up your workouts. Also, everyone is different and genetics play a big role. It also depends on what your goals are. If you are very over weight and just want to lose weight and feel better, or do you want to get to a certain body fat percentage, while keeping a fair amount of muscle mass? And to answer the question about burning protein as a fuel, that’s an easy one. If your sweat has an ammonia smell to it, you’re burning proteins. I get this all the time when I do my stair running/sprinting routines. Not necessarily a good thing, and I try to take in more complex carbs before I do it, that helps.
  24. Posted by Carl
    The article is well written, but the fact that many of these are myths has become common knowledge in recent years. I know this is going to sound kinda sales-pitchy, but a great program for burning fat is Tom Venuto's Burn the Fat Feed the muscle. I've always had weight problems and in the years it took me to get them under control, I've done a lot of research and tried a lot of different things, but I was so impressed with this particular program that I created a website about it: http://www.bestfatburningexercisereview.com Check it out, read my story, hopefully it'll interest you enough to try it out!
  25. Posted by The Pink Ninja
    Fat loss = forcing your body to burn fat = using more calories then you would normaly eat. Think what ever you want, but this article explains in detail how to achieve this fat loss. Although some parts of the article are less accurate then others, the general idea is well explained. P.S. I'm riped as f#*&
  26. Posted by Tom
    This is a good article and has some confusing parts but is also very true. If you are primarily trying to lose weight, yes increase intensity but if you are not trying to lose any muscle, and just trying to lose fat than the opposite is true, lower your intensity. Its all about what your goals are.
  27. Posted by Ryan
    This article is correct. If you want to lose weight then you have to do HIT. The fat burning zone is for people who are obese, people with injuries (or at severe risk of unjury), and people who don't like doing stuff thats hard (crybabies). For people who are just somewhat overweight or need to tone up and lose fat HIT is better. I would point out the comment by the person who said "how many high intensity athletes do you see with extra stores of fat on them?" That means sprinters, short distance, and medium distance runners. Thats right none! They are the leanest people you will ever see and they specialize in HIT. Weightloss can be done both ways but its not practical for most people to burn the calories they need to by doing the "fat burning zone". High intensity will get you more results, quicker, and you will be more healthy in the long run. Do you see all the really well endowed and in-shape people in the gym doing low intensity fat burning? No you don't. They are jogging on that treadmill, hauling ass on the cross country machine, and jamming on that stair stepper. And lets not forget that most of them are strength training also. If you want to LOOK LIKE THEM then you have to WORK LIKE THEM people. I am not a personal trainer or a PHD but I know my own body and have done plenty of research on my own. Of have turned plenty of people around on this and many of my friends have lost significant weight taking my advice. I lift weights right now with only some cardio but I can lose 10% bodyfat at will within a few weeks anytime I want. I have the muscle mass to burn it! I recently slimmed up for a trip up Mount Whitney in the Sierras. In 6 weeks I went from 203 and 18% bodyfat to 175 and 8% bodyfat. The vast majority of that weight loss is fat (do the math). Those are results you take to the bank people. All full body strength training and high intensity cardio people. Now I am at 195 with 12% bodyfat and getting ready to bulk up again. That also was done at will. The point is you need to learn what your body responds to, but that hard work, proper diet, dedication, experimentation, and research are what it takes to reach your goals. Oh yeah, and High Intensity Cardio with Strength Training if you want to lose fat!
  28. Posted by George
    One more of those self-appointed know-it-all gurus. The article hurts. Research before you write - at least you will be parroting the right stuff.
  29. Posted by Guru
    No self-appointed guru's here. Only people who know what works. If you are not doing consistent/frequent cardio near or slightly above your maximum, not undertaking some form of weight training at a level that you actually feel something in your muscles at some point after you work them, and are not eating healthy foods in appropriate amounts at frequent intervals, then your body will not reach what it can be. If you are content looking average with fat covering everything up then don't try too hard and you'll be healthy enough. But if you want to be truly healthy and you want your body to be trim/leaned/toned/ripped so that people actually notice then do the above, don't worry about the science, your body will figure that out ... the choice is up to the individual what level they want to take it too. The information above can only hurt those who are grossly out of shape and/or have not exercised for a long time and those who have medical conditions (likely a result of extended periods of inactivity and poor diet btw) and who jump into a program at too high a level too quickly. But no one should limit themselves because someone thinks that too much intensity will hurt them, build up to it properly and stop when you're happy with the outcome ... don't limit yourself by someone who trys to stop you because they're afraid you're going to hurt yourself. Everyone should be responsible for doing their own research and take responsibilty for their own actions. If you blindly follow just any old random advice you find on a posting you can run into trouble, but these forum's are what they are, a place for people to post what they have found works for them and this can help other people. There are many ways to reach your goals ... find the one that works for you and listen to lots of people and listen most to the ones who look like what you want to look like and who live like you want to live and are as healthy as you want be. But if you don't want to put in a little extra effort or actually push your body so you feel it, then you are doing yourself a disservice worse than listening to someone who says that more information actually hurts.
  30. Posted by lalaloopy
    This repeats itself way too much - did everyone fail to notice that REDICULOUSLY obvious information is blurted out like a broken record?! If you run for half an hour, you are going to burn more calories than if you walk for half an hour, because its a more intensive exercise! DUH! Is this person retarded?! My best friend has a very different body shape and type to me (I'm very tall and curvy, she's petite and boyish) but we eat very similar foods, very similar amounts, very similar times, etc. I do little to no exercise daily whereas she's a county level athlete and runs several miles twice a week, intermittent with other exercises (boxing, rowing machine, exercise bike, light weights with long repetitions - good way to tone rather than build bulky muscle) so OF COURSE she is several dress sizes smaller than me!! Everyone makes such a fuss about diet but as long as it is balanced and if you can be bothered to make the time to get fit and regularly complete a varied exercise regime, there is no reason why you should be fat. My friend and I sometimes, for example, have a stressfull month and eat crappy fattening junk food nearly every day, but she doesn't put on weight because she burns it off.. that's why I have a fat ass!! Because despite the fact my dad competed at some of the world's biggest athletics championships and still features in the top 5 world x-country record times for a non-african (well come on, the ethiopians and kenyans are from another planet when it comes to running!!), I just don't enjoy exercise very much and I'm lazy!! So although I complain about my tummy or butt, I know I could lose it if I really wanted to!! Oh and I skim-read some of the "Guru's" comments and you can't really fault that advice, you're an idiot if you disagree tbh, its pretty simple. Food in + exercise = calories burned. Really? NO S**T!! Anyway, I love reading this stuff, some people talk such crap. Good luck people on burning off your fat!! I'ma go eat some cookies...
  31. Posted by Gary
    49 years old and I lost 40lbs so far in the past 75 days. My doctor can't even believe it. All by reducing calories (mostly the junk food). Eating more frequently and smaller portions. Snacks are fruit when I feel the need. During this 75 days was Thanksgiving, Christmas, and several weekends out where I ate full normal meals, so I haven't really been starving by any means. The biggest difference is exercise. My doc checked my heart out, then I started 3-4 days a week on a treadclimber, 30 minutes each session after I reached my max heart rate of 171 or slightly under. This is what my doctor believes is how I got these results so far. So... I don't care if it is fat, carbs, or turds I'm burning! I'm finally getting healthy! 35 more lbs to go!
  32. Posted by Tony H
    I take onboard the observation that to lose weight, calories out (burned) whether from fat or carbs must be greater than calories in (eaten). Fine, but I'm wondering what triggers hunger (the desire to eat) and thus affects the number of calories taken in? In particular, I wonder if low carb-stores trigger the impulse to eat, whereas fat burned does not trigger any such impulse. If this were the case, then it would be beneficial to burn fat in preference to carbs (i.e a higher percentage of fat), since for a given amount of exercise (calories burned), the depletion of the carb stores would then be less, leading to a reduced desire to eat and undo the good work done by the exercise. Can anyone tell me what triggers hunger/the desire to take in more calories?
  33. Posted by chumbuks
    to those people who clouded the discussion with technical rubbish- slow down we havnt all got majors in physiology and to every one else i.e normal people who just want to lose weight and excersise proberly im sure you are all doing brilliantly.im big and fat and not at all happy about it the main thing to remember is to get that heart pumping and excersise those muscles not to lose 10lbs in a day but to improve our overall long term health status do this and the rest will follow.my motto= lifestyle change is my goal not weightloss
  34. Posted by FitHick
    The simple approach mentioned by others has worked for me. I'm now 25 and fitter than ever, but I wasn't always that way. For example, when I was 15 my also out-of-shape friend challenged me to a quarter mile footrace. We didn't realize how bad off we were until we finished the race (barely) and both fell over in pain. I was embarrassed by such pathetic performance. I didn't have any excuse for it either - no disabilities or medical conditions. To fix myself I joined the high school cross country team and pushed myself as much as I could. I certainly wasn't the star of the team, in fact I usually came in second or third to last on the team of 25 or so runners. But it got the job done. After a few weeks I could sprint one or two miles no problem, or jog four or six miles okay. I have kept up running since then: some days quarter or half-mile sprints, other days a 5 K, and yet other days a four mile jog. I also lift weights, do calisthenics, and STRETCH. I typically workout 5 days/week, usually a mix of running/non-running, but other days I run exclusively. Also, when I was 15 I gave up fast food and have never gone back - that's right, no McDonald's, Sonic, or Taco Bell for the last 10 years. I have since lost all appetite for it and going without has long since become a non-issue. Whenever I do get tempted, though, to eat to many Cheetos or something like that, I just check the nutritional facts for serving size and fat calories. I know from many miles on many different treadmills that I burn about 120 cal and 30 fat cal for every mile I burn. The small bag of Cheetos out of the vending machine has 180 fat cal so I would have to run 6 miles to burn off the fat from that one bag. Today I'm 5'11", 170 lbs, and my BMI is normal at 23.7. Eat sensibly and workout hard enough to get a little bit sore. Repeat for life.

Leave a Reply


Post Comment

Connect with For Dummies

Sign Up for RSS Feeds

Health & Fitness

Inside Dummies.com

Dummies.com Sweepstakes

Win a Netbook with Windows 7!